one for you video tech bods.
check out these images. 3 different dvd releases.
do we agree that shot 1 shows most on all sides?
and shot 2 seems the sharpest?
right, now onto my question.
why do we get such variations?
if it was between a 4:3 version and a 16:9 version i would understand.
but in this case, all have been released as 2.35:1 or thereabouts.
if the negative/film was actually, say, 2.20:1, then why not make the dvd 2.20:1?
why go to all the trouble of making a dvd release and then cropping the final image?
any ideas people?